Dc. Osullivan et al., SHOULD STAMEY COLPOSUSPENSION BE OUR PRIMARY SURGERY FOR STRESS-INCONTINENCE, British Journal of Urology, 75(4), 1995, pp. 457-460
Objective To evaluate the outcome of the Stamey procedure for stress i
ncontinence and to decide if it is an acceptable first-line option for
the treatment of patients. Patients and methods Between June 1987 and
March 1993 67 women had Stamey bladder neck suspension carried out fo
r the treatment of stress incontinence. In September 1993 all patients
received a detailed questionnaire to ascertain their present status.
Results Immediately after surgery 70% of patients were dry and 15% wer
e much improved. At 6 months 56% of patients were dry and 21% were muc
h improved. More than 1 year following surgery, of 58 patients respond
ing only 31% were dry and 28% were much improved. More than 5 years af
ter surgery only 18% of the 28 women responding were dry. The factors
which were significantly associated with failure were obesity (P < 0.0
05) and the number of pads used per day (P < 0.05). Previous surgery m
ay also be an important factor. Conclusion The Stamey vesical neck sus
pension has a good early success rate but the results in the longer te
rm are not acceptable. This operation should not be used as a first-li
ne treatment for stress incontinence and should be reserved for specif
ic patient subgroups.