COMPARISON OF THE BAERVELDT GLAUCOMA IMPLANT WITH THE DOUBLE-PLATE MOLTENO DRAINAGE IMPLANT

Citation
Mf. Smith et al., COMPARISON OF THE BAERVELDT GLAUCOMA IMPLANT WITH THE DOUBLE-PLATE MOLTENO DRAINAGE IMPLANT, Archives of ophthalmology, 113(4), 1995, pp. 444-447
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00039950
Volume
113
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
444 - 447
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9950(1995)113:4<444:COTBGI>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: To compare the 350-mm(2) Baerveldt implant with the double- plate Molteno implant in the treatment of eyes with complicated glauco ma. Design: Retrospective chart review of a consecutive series of drai nage implants. Setting: University-based referral practice. Patients: Thirty-four consecutive patients (37 eyes) undergoing glaucoma drainag e device implantation because of uncontrolled, complicated glaucoma. I ntervention: Eighteen eyes underwent 350-mm(2) Baerveldt implantation and 19 eyes underwent double-plate Molteno implantation. Main Outcome Measures: Intraocular pressure (IOP) control, visual acuity outcome, a nd complication rate. Results: Mean preoperative IOP was 30.2 mm Hg in the Baerveldt group, with an average of 2.7 antiglaucoma medications, and 28.4 mm Hg in the Molteno group, with an average of 2.4 antiglauc oma medications. With an average follow-up of 11.3 months (range, 5 to 16 months), mean IOP at the final visit was 13.1 mm Hg (range, 7 to 2 1 mm Hg) in the Baerveldt group, with an average of 1.3 medications, a nd 13.4 mm Hg (range, 8 to 25 mm Hg) in the Molteno group, with an ave rage of 0.8 medications. Final IOP was between 7 and 19 mm Hg in 16 of 18 Baerveldt eyes and in 17 of 19 Molteno eyes. Visual acuity (when i t could be checked) remained stable (+/-2 Snellen lines) in 17 of 17 e yes in the Baerveldt group and in 17 of 19 eyes in the Molteno group. Complications in the Baerveldt group included two cases (11%) of flat anterior chamber after stent removal, one case (6%) of intermittently symptomatic diplopia, and one case (6%) of endophthalmitis. In the Mol teno group there were two graft failures (11%) and one eye (5%) with l oss of central field. Conclusions: Both types of drainage implants pro vide excellent postoperative IOP control. Early stent removal should b e avoided if possible in eyes with Baerveldt implants.