Jl. Keltner et Ca. Johnson, SHORT-WAVELENGTH AUTOMATED PERIMETRY IN NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGICAL DISORDERS, Archives of ophthalmology, 113(4), 1995, pp. 475-481
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of short-wavelength automated peri
metry (SWAP) in the assessment of patients with neuro-ophthalmologic d
isorders, especially optic neuropathies. Methods: A modified Humphrey
field analyzer was used to perform standard automated perimetry and SW
AP, a technique that isolates the activity of short-wavelength-sensiti
ve (''blue'') mechanisms. Forty patients (80 eyes) were evaluated by S
WAP and standard automated perimetry. Thirteen patients (26 eyes) had
recovered from optic neuritis and/or multiple sclerosis, 15 (30 eyes)
were in various stages of treatment for pseudotumor cerebri, and 12 (2
4 eyes) had other miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions. Six a
dditional patients (12 eyes) with neuro-ophthalmologic conditions were
tested twice on different days during a 2-week period, with the order
of SWAP and standard perimetric testing being reversed on the second
day. Results: Of the 80 eyes tested, 38 (48%) had SWAP visual fields t
hat were worse than standard automated perimetry results; 29 (36%) sho
wed no difference between standard and SWAP visual fields; and 13 (16%
) had standard automated perimetry results that were worse than SWAP v
isual fields. Of the 26 eyes in patients with optic neuritis and/or mu
ltiple sclerosis, 15 (58%) had SWAP results that were worse than stand
ard visual fields. Ten (33%) of the 30 eyes with pseudotumor cerebri h
ad SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results, and 1
3 (54%) of 24 eyes with miscellaneous neuro-ophthalmologic conditions
had SWAP results worse than standard automated perimetry results. For
the 12 eyes undergoing repeated testing, SWAP visual fields were worse
when they were performed last, perhaps indicating that some fatigue e
ffect was present. This was observed for standard visual fields as wel
l, but to a smaller extent. Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest
that SWAP may be useful in detecting certain neuro-ophthalmologic defi
cits more readily than standard automated visual field testing, especi
ally for optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Further evaluations wi
ll be necessary to define the effects of fatigue for SWAP visual field
s in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders.