Ba. Lintzenich et al., INFLUENCE OF PROCESSING SUPPLEMENTAL ALFALFA ON INTAKE AND DIGESTION OF DORMANT BLUESTEM-RANGE FORAGE BY STEERS, Journal of animal science, 73(4), 1995, pp. 1187-1195
Four ruminally and duodenally fistulated, 2-yr-old Angus x Hereford st
eers (average initial BW = 370 kg) were used to evaluate the effect of
method of processing supplemental alfalfa on intake and digestion of
dormant bluestem-range forage (2.8% CP, 78% NDF). Treatments (4 x 4 La
tin square) were I) control, no supplement; 2) ground and pelleted alf
alfa hay (PELLET; 21% CP, 37% NDF); 3) ground and pelleted dehydrated
alfalfa (DEHY; 21% CP, 44% NDF); and 4) longstem alfalfa hay (HAY; 20%
CP, 37% NDF). All supplements were from a single cutting of alfalfa a
nd fed at .5% BW (as-fed basis). Supplementing steers with alfalfa inc
reased(P less than or equal to .07) bluestem forage OM intake (FOMI);
total OM intake (TOMI); true ruminal OM digestibility; total tract OM
digestibility (TTOMD); total N, microbial N, and nonammonia-nonmicrobi
al N (NANM) flows to the duodenum; ruminal OM and fluid fill; fluid di
lution rates; dietary DE concentration; and ruminal total VFA and NH3
N concentrations. Because of the enhanced FOMI and TOMI associated wit
h alfalfa supplementation and the concomitant improvement in TTOMD, di
gestible OM intake (DOMI) also increased (P < .01) when supplemental a
lfalfa was fed. Method of processing alfalfa had little impact on fora
ge utilization, except FOMI (P = .11), TOMI (P = .10), and ruminal OM
fill (P = .09) tended to be greater when supplemental alfalfa pellets
were dehydrated. Similarly, processing method tended to alter the mola
r proportions of some minor VFA. In conclusion, alfalfa supplementatio
n exerted a dramatic impact on utilization of low-quality forage. Howe
ver, with the relatively high-quality alfalfa used, method of processi
ng supplemental alfalfa had minimal impact on utilization of low-quali
ty forage by beef cattle.