Pfwm. Rosier et al., VARIABILITY OF PRESSURE-FLOW ANALYSIS PARAMETERS IN REPEATED CYSTOMETRY IN PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA, The Journal of urology, 153(5), 1995, pp. 1520-1525
Urodynamic investigation becomes increasingly important in the diagnos
is of bladder outflow obstruction in patients with benign prostatic hy
perplasia. To date, different methods for evaluation of the pressure-f
low relationship and quantification of the grade of obstruction are av
ailable. Models for pressure-flow analysis are briefly explained. The
variability of the parameters is investigated by evaluation of 75 pati
ents in whom 2 sequential voidings during urodynamic investigation wer
e analyzed. The results showed that in 87% of these patients individua
l maximum flow differences of first and second voidings were less than
2 ml. per second. Individual detrusor pressure at maximum flow differ
ences were less than 15 cm. water in 80% of these patients, while in 8
0% the intra-individual variation of the pressure-flow results was les
s than 15 cm. water for the minimal voiding pressure parameters (minim
al urethral opening detrusor pressure and urethral resistance factor).
For the pressure-flow parameter that defines the theoretical urethral
lumen during voiding, the variation was less than 1.5 mm.(2) in 84% o
f the patients. Patients with larger intra-individual differences are
discussed. We concluded that the observed, aforementioned differences
can be regarded as an indication of normal intra-individual variabilit
y of voiding during urodynamic investigation. This intra-individual va
riability, however, seldom leads to a change in the clinical grade of
bladder outflow obstruction. We conclude that investigators involved i
n therapeutic trials of benign prostatic hyperplasia must be aware of
this intra-individual variability of micturition, since this variabili
ty is greater than the refined scale of the pressure-flow analysis mod
els.