Hp. Busch, DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR IMAGING OF THE THORAX AND THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACTS, Journal of digital imaging, 8(1), 1995, pp. 8-10
In evaluating the image quality of the chest, four different analog an
d digital methods were compared. For peripheral lung field, the advanc
ed multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) system was given the
best score, followed in order by the storage phosphor, conventional,
and asymmetric film/screen systems. For the mediastinal field, the hig
hest image quality was given to the AMBER system, followed by storage
phosphor and asymmetric film/screen system. The best overall image qua
lity, especially with regard to demonstration of pathologic alteration
, was given to the AMBER system, followed by the storage-phosphor, con
ventional, and asymmetric film/screen radiography systems. In conclusi
on, AMBER demonstrated the highest image quality. The storage-phosphor
system provided better results in the peripheral and mediastinal fiel
ds in comparison with conventional film/screen systems. Other digital
systems in eluding selenium chest radiography system and image intensi
fier digital radiography were also discussed. Copyright (C) 1995 by W.
B. Saunders Company