Current wisdom suggests that high or increasing crime levels make comm
unities decline. Researchers usually translate decline to mean an incr
easing desire to move or higher actual mobility of residents; weaker a
ttachments of residents to, and satisfaction with, their neighborhood;
less local involvement; and lower house values. Empirical research co
nfirms only some of this wisdom. Crime relates as expected to house pr
ices, neighborhood satisfaction, and the desire to move. But research
simultaneously suggests that crime neither spurs mobility nor necessar
ily decreases local involvement. Past research fails to differentiate
the impacts of specific crime rates and does not examine impacts of st
atic versus changing crime rates. This article examines impacts of pas
t and changing crime levels on changes in relative house values and va
cancy rates in Baltimore, Maryland, neighborhoods in the 1970s. The re
sults reveal that different crimes influence different aspects of the
housing market. Past and changing crime rates play roles in ecological
transitions of neighborhoods. In keeping with the current findings of
contingent impacts of racial change on mobility, I suggest that impac
ts of crime and related problems on neighborhood viability may be cont
ingent on personal, historical, and locale-specific factors.