For more than two decades, the United States has been at war with stre
et crime, but we have precious little to show for it. Our obsession wi
th punishment at the expense of, indeed to the exclusion of, preventio
n is not just futile but criminogenic and divisive. This article expla
ins what is problematic about our indiscriminately punitive response t
o street crime and explores the political forces driving these self-de
feating policies. What emerges is an understanding of the politics of
street crime that is rooted less in the fear of crime than in a variet
y of anxieties that transcend street crime but are affectively related
to it. Criminals provide a convenient target for the anger that is wi
dely felt, but is not quite appropriate to express, with respect to un
welcome changes in race relations, employment opportunities, homelessn
ess, and the like. To serve their own distinct but convergent purposes
, the media, the public, and the politicians all contribute to the per
petuation of our perverse approach to controlling street crime. While
there are countervailing forces at work, they seem unlikely to prevail
in the foreseeable future.