Background. One of the epidemiologist's most basic tasks is estimation
of disease occurrence. To perform this task, the epidemiologist frequ
ently models variability in disease occurrence using one of three dist
ributions-the binomial, the Poisson or the exponential distribution. A
lthough epidemiologists often use them and their properties appear in
standard texts, we know of no text or review that compares and contras
ts epidemiological application of these distributions. Methods. In thi
s commentary, we discuss these three basic distributions. We note key
assumptions as well as limitations, and compare results from analyses
based on each distribution. Results and Conclusions. We illustrate tha
t the three distributions, although superficially different, often lea
d to similar results. We argue that epidemiologists should often obtai
n similar results regardless of which distribution they use. We also p
oint out that application of all three distributions can be inappropri
ate if assumptions of independence or homogeneity of risks fail to hol
d. Finally, we briefly review how these basic distributions can be use
d to justify use of other distributions, such as the Gaussian distribu
tion, for studying disease-exposure associations.