This study was designed to investigate the apparent contradiction betw
een recent reports of physiological and interpersonal research on stut
tering that claim or imply high agreement levels, and studies of stutt
ering judgment agreement itself that report much lower agreement level
s. Four experienced stuttering researchers in one university departmen
t used laser videodisks of spontaneous speech, from persons whose stut
tering could be described as mild to severe, to locate the precise ons
et and offset of individual stuttering events. Results showed a series
of interjudge disagreements that raise serious questions about the re
liability and validity of stuttering event onset and offset judgments.
These results highlight the potentially poor reliability of a measure
ment procedure that is currently widespread in stuttering research. At
the same time, they have isolated some few highly agreed stuttering e
vents that might serve as the basis for the further development of eit
her event-based or interval-based judgment procedures.