One of the natural methods of tactual communication in common use amon
g individuals who are both deaf and blind is the tactual reception of
sign language. In this method, the receiver (who is deaf-blind) places
a hand (or hands) on the dominant (or both) hand(s) of the signer in
order to receive, through the tactual sense, the various formational p
roperties associated with signs. In the study reported here, 10 experi
enced deaf-blind users of either American Sign Language (ASL) or Pidgi
n Sign English (PSE) participated in experiments to determine their ab
ility to receive signed materials including isolated signs and sentenc
es. A set of 122 isolated signs was received with an average accuracy
of 87% correct. The most frequent type of error made in identifying is
olated signs was related to misperception of individual phonological c
omponents of signs. For presentation of signed sentences (translations
of the English CID sentences into ASL or PSE), the performance of ind
ividual subjects ranged from 60-85% correct reception of key signs. Pe
rformance on sentences was relatively independent of rate of presentat
ion in signs/sec, which covered a range of roughly 1 to 3 signs/sec. S
entence errors were accounted for primarily by deletions and phonologi
cal and semantic/syntactic substitutions. Experimental results are dis
cussed in terms of differences in performance for isolated signs and s
entences, differences in error patterns for the ASL and PSE groups, an
d communication rates relative to visual reception of sign language an
d other natural methods of tactual communication.