R. Bohte et al., EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF AZITHROMYCIN VERSUS BENZYLPENICILLIN OR ERYTHROMYCIN IN COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA, European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 14(3), 1995, pp. 182-187
Azithromycin, a recently introduced antibiotic, offers the potential a
dvantages of short-course administration and lower toxicity compared t
o other macrolides. Approved for the treatment of mild pneumonia, this
drug was investigated in a study of patients hospitalized for communi
ty-acquired pneumonia. In an open-labelled randomized study, oral azit
hromycin was compared with intravenous benzylpenicillin in patients su
spected to have pneumococcal pneumonia. Azithromycin was also compared
with erythromycin, both administered orally, in all other patients. T
hree hundred thirty-four patients with community-acquired pneumonia we
re hospitalized, 108 of whom were randomized; 104 could be evaluated.
A need for intravenous therapy was the most common reason for exclusio
n. In the pneumococcal group, 35 patients received azithromycin and 29
benzylpenicillin. The clinical and radiological success rate achieved
with azithromycin (83 %) was considerably higher than that achieved w
ith benzylpenicillin (66 %), though the difference was not significant
. In the non-pneumococcal group, 19 patients received azithromycin and
21 erythromycin; no differences in the success rate were found (79 %
and 76 %, respectively). Eight patients on azithromycin had a blood cu
lture positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae; in three of these patient
s therapy was changed. None of the five patients with pneumococcal bac
teraemia who received benzylpenicillin required a change in therapy. I
t is concluded that oral azithromycin, administered as short-course th
erapy, is an appropriate antibiotic for treating patients with communi
ty-acquired pneumonia. However, it is not yet certain that azithromyci
n is a good choice for patients with pneumococcal bacteraemia.