B. Liesenfeld et al., QUALITY OF DOCUMENTATION IN MEDICAL REPORTS OF DIABETIC-PATIENTS, International journal for quality in health care, 8(6), 1996, pp. 537-542
In a retrospective analysis of 752 consecutive medical reports of pati
ents with insulin- or noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, we inves
tigated the completeness of documentation of indicators of quality of
care, The medical reports are the currently used form of documentation
which is sent to the General Practitioner after the patient's dischar
ge from hospital, The indicators of care were data on clinical history
, physical examination, laboratory results and secondary complications
. The documentation was incomplete; e.g. in 8.0% of insulin-dependent
(IDDM) and in 26.4% of non-insulin-dependent diabetics (NIDDM), HbA1c
was missing, In 7.6%, the type of diabetes was not stated, The frequen
cy of recorded secondary complications was lower than it has to be exp
ected considering metabolic control and duration of diabetes of the st
udied group, Documentation was more complete for IDDM patients, The re
ports of NIDDM patients with incipient or overt diabetic nephropathy r
evealed less frequent recordings of data on lipid metabolism and blood
pressure compared to the group without nephropathy. The documentation
of indicators of quality of care in medical reports for general pract
itioners is incomplete for many diabetic inpatients, Standardized meth
ods of documentation are required urgently, Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevie
r Science Ltd.