As. Whittemore et al., FAMILY HISTORY AND PROSTATE-CANCER RISK IN BLACK, WHITE, AND ASIAN MEN IN THE UNITED-STATES AND CANADA, American journal of epidemiology, 141(8), 1995, pp. 732-740
Increased risk of prostate cancer in men with a family history of the
disease has been observed consistently in epidemiologic studies. Howev
er, most studies have been confined to white men; little is known abou
t familiar aggregation of prostate cancer in populations with unusuall
y high incidence, such as African Americans, or in populations with lo
w incidence, such as Asian-Americans. The authors report results from
a population-based case-control study of prostate cancer among blacks,
whites, and Asian-Americans in the United States and Canada. Controls
were matched to cases on age (5-year groups), ethnicity (black, white
, Chinese-American, Japanese-American), and region of residence (Los A
ngeles, San Francisco, Hawaii, Vancouver, Toronto). In the combined gr
oup of participants, 5% of controls and 13% of cases reported a father
, brother, or son with prostate cancer. These prevalences were somewha
t lower among Asian-Americans than among blacks or whiles. A positive
family history was associated with a statistically significant two- to
threefold increase in risk in each of the three ethnic groups. The ov
erall odds ratio associated with such a family history, adjusted for a
ge and ethnicity, was 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.9-3.3). This odds
ratio varied by neither ethnicity nor age of the participants. Sera f
rom 1,087 controls were used to examine the relations between family h
istory and serum concentrations of androgens and prostate-specific ant
igen. The concentrations of sex hormone-binding globulin were slightly
higher in men with than without a positive family history. Prostate-s
pecific antigen concentrations were unrelated to family history.