PHARMACOLOGICAL STRESS-INDUCED REGIONAL MYOCARDIAL BLOOD-FLOW HETEROGENEITY AND LEFT-VENTRICULAR WALL THICKENING ABNORMALITY - COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS ADENOSINE WITH DIPYRIDAMOLE IN A MODEL OF CRITICAL CORONARY STENOSIS
Eo. Ofili et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL STRESS-INDUCED REGIONAL MYOCARDIAL BLOOD-FLOW HETEROGENEITY AND LEFT-VENTRICULAR WALL THICKENING ABNORMALITY - COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS ADENOSINE WITH DIPYRIDAMOLE IN A MODEL OF CRITICAL CORONARY STENOSIS, The American heart journal, 133(1), 1997, pp. 78-86
Variations in reported sensitivity of myocardial perfusion scans or wa
ll motion abnormalities during pharmacologic stress with intravenous a
denosine and dipyridamole may be caused by differences in myocardial o
xygen demand or myocardial blood flow redistribution induced by each a
gent. To investigate the physiologic correlates of functional abnormal
ities during pharmacologic stress testing, regional myocardial blood f
low (radiolabeled microsphere technique) and left ventricular segmenta
l wall thickening (quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography) were
measured in 9 dogs with an open chest model of critical stenosis of t
he left circumflex coronary artery. Data were obtained at baseline and
peak drug infusion for intravenous adenosine (0.42 mg/kg over a 3-min
ute period) and for intravenous dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg over a 4-minu
te period). Adenosine and dipyridamole induced regional flow abnormali
ty in 7 (77%) of 9 dogs. Myocardial segments with decreased endocardia
l/epicardial flow ratio were similar for both agents (2.9 +/- 1.8 vs 2
.7 +/- 1.3, p = [NS]). Segments with myocardial flow heterogeneity (ra
tio of endocardial flow to control left anterior descending/left circu
mflex endocardial flow) were similar for both agents (2.7 +/- 0.9 vs 2
.3 +/- 1.0, p = NS). Adenosine-induced wall thickening abnormality (77
% vs 55% with dipyridamole) correlated with regional flow abnormality.
Significantly lower mean arterial pressure (53 +/- 1.7 mm Hg vs 64 +/
- 1.9 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and more prolonged drug effect (18 +/- 6.4 min
vs 3 +/- 1.4 min, p < 0.001) were seen for dipyridamole compared with
adenosine. Adenosine induces regional flow abnormality similar to dipy
ridamole but with less hemodynamic perturbation, and adenosine-induced
wall thickening abnormality more closely parallels regional flow abno
rmality.