J. Renneberg et al., EVALUATION OF STAPH-ID-32 SYSTEM AND STAPH-ZYM SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFICATION OF COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI, Journal of clinical microbiology, 33(5), 1995, pp. 1150-1153
The purpose of the investigation was to evaluate two commercially avai
lable identification systems: a new modification of the Staph-Zym syst
em (Rosco, Tastrup, Denmark) and the Staph ID 32 API system (API Syste
m, BioMerieux, Paris, France). A local standard method to be used in r
outine laboratories aas also evaluated. A total of 200 staphylococcal
isolates, including strains from both the American Type Culture Collec
tion and the Czechoslovak Collection of Microorganisms as well as 89 c
linical isolates, were used in tests of all three identification syste
ms. The Staph ID 32 API system identified from 50 to 100% of the refer
ence strains and 82.1% of the clinical isolates correctly. The Staph-Z
ym system identified from 90 to 100% of the reference strains and 82.1
% of the clinical isolates correctly. Most misidentifications were of
minor importance, but in both systems major failures appeared (Staphyl
ococcus aureus was identified as a coagulase-negative staphylococcus).
Both systems needed backup from a reference laboratory to determine i
f two isolates were of the same strain.