Ma. Lara et al., EVALUATION OF ATTACHMENT PATTERN REPRESEN TATIONS IN MEXICAN CHILDRENTHROUGH FAMILY DESIGNS - A ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP, Salud mental, 18(1), 1995, pp. 56-60
Attachment theory, initially developed by Bowlby and later by Ainswort
h, describes emotional and cognitive development on the basis of the b
ond developed in childhood between young children and their attachment
figure. This theory has served as a conceptual model to explain the e
ffects of the mother's employment on child development. In a previous
study, Lara et al (14) assessed the effects of the mother's occupation
on children's representations of attachment. The aim of the present s
tudy was to assess the consistency of the attachment categories, devel
oped in the first study, one year later. This was of great importance
to us as the first study lead us to some interesting findings. On the
one hand, we found a very low percentage of children classified as sec
ure, and on the other, we found no influence of the mothers' occupatio
nal status on children's attachment representations. In the follow up
stage a subsample of 48 children (from a sample of 211) was assessed i
n terms of attachment representations obtained from family drawings. C
hildren's age at first evaluation ranged from 5 to 6 years and eleven
months old. Findings showed that 77% of the cases remained within the
same classification, while 17% changed form the first to the second on
e. We interpreted these results as somehow expected. It has been asser
ted that, although a great stability of these patterns through life is
presumed, some of the main attachment patterns may disorganize due to
developmental and environmental factors. Thus, these variations canno
t necessarily be interpreted as a reliability problem. Therefore it ca
n be said that great consistency was observed in the majority of the c
ases and only in the remaining 6%, errors due to classification were d
etected. These results give evidence of the reliability of our classif
ication system of attachment patterns, and thus we can, with greater c
onfidence, sustain our previous conclusions (Lara et al.) (14) regardi
ng the lack of effects of maternal employment on children's attachment
representations, and the very low percentage of children from this po
pulation with secure attachment. Some possible causes are discussed in
this paper.