THE EFFECT OF DOSAGE RELEASE FORMULATIONS ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPRANOLOL STEREOISOMERS IN HUMANS

Citation
Be. Bleske et al., THE EFFECT OF DOSAGE RELEASE FORMULATIONS ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPRANOLOL STEREOISOMERS IN HUMANS, Journal of clinical pharmacology, 35(4), 1995, pp. 374-378
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
00912700
Volume
35
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
374 - 378
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-2700(1995)35:4<374:TEODRF>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Recent studies in dogs have suggested that the disposition of S- and R -propranolol may depend on the input rate of drug delivered to the liv er. Therefore, this study was designed to determine whether difference s in the disposition of S- and R-propranolol occur in humans when alte ring the input rate of propranolol by giving different dosage forms of the drug. Twelve healthy subjects were enrolled in a single-dose, 4-w ay crossover pharmacokinetic study in which racemic propranolol was gi ven according to 1 of 4 treatments: one 80-mg immediate-release (IR) t ablet, phase A; two 80-mg IR tablets, phase B; a 160-mg controlled-rel ease capsule, phase C; or a 10-mg IV bolus, phase D, The results showe d no significant differences in the ratios of S/R-propranolol for AUG, clearance, or overall mean concentration among the oral dosage groups . Significant differences in these parameters including C-max S/R rati o were seen between the oral phases and the IV phase, These difference s appear to be related more to the route of administration than to the low input rate. However, at high concentrations there may be input-ra te alteration in S/R ratios. Specifically, for phase B, which had the highest C-max concentrations, the C-max S/R ratio was significantly lo wer than the other oral dosage groups A and C (C-max S/R ratios: 1.44 versus 1.54 and 1.54, respectively; P < .05). These results suggest, a s shown by the C-max S/R ratio, that al high concentrations as seen af ter 160-mg IR propranolol, the disposition of S- and R-enantiomers may be different (i.e., input-rate dependent) compared with dosage forms that result in lower drug concentrations. This may have important clin ical implications, because the pharmacodynamic response may be altered .