The predictions of optimal parental investment theory were tested by s
tudying nest defence decisions of willow tits, Parus montanus. As pred
icted, parental defence intensity increased with offspring age, female
parents defended early and middle-season broods more vigorously than
late ones and the annual proportion of mobbers correlated significantl
y with annual means of clutch and brood sizes. Against the predictions
, defence intensity was not adjusted to the quality (weight, size and
condition) or quantity of offspring, which was also confirmed by brood
size manipulation experiments. In this respect, willow tits seemed to
commit the so-called Concorde fallacy. A suggested explanation for th
ese non-adaptive responses is that a trait to determine the brood valu
e continuously is not needed, since breeding success is high and predi
ctable every year. In addition, in this population parents with reduce
d and enlarged broods had the same fitness as those with control brood
s. Therefore, parents behaved optimally when they did not change their
defence intensity according to the manipulations. Thus, this lack of
response to unnatural variation in a minor component of lifetime repro
ductive success could be considered a pseudo Concorde fallacy. These r
esults suggest that parents are able to predict the forthcoming breedi
ng success early in the season, and that this prediction holds quite p
recisely, with parental investment levels being relatively equal regar
dless of clutch and brood size.