HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS HEPATITIS IN LIVER ALLOGRAFTS

Citation
F. Colina et al., HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS HEPATITIS IN LIVER ALLOGRAFTS, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 48(4), 1995, pp. 351-357
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
ISSN journal
00219746
Volume
48
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
351 - 357
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9746(1995)48:4<351:HDOCHI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Aims-To determine the incidence of histologically documented cytomegal ovirus (CMV) hepatitis following orthotopic Liver transplantation (OLT ) and to assess the effectiveness of immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation (ISH) in detecting CMV. To describe the histological pat tern most frequently associated with CMV hepatitis in order to select the biopsy group in which these modern techniques are most effective. Methods-A prospective histological study was carried out on 853 biopsy specimens, obtained from 191 liver allografts (160 patients). Specime ns were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemically (avidin-biotin complex) using monoclonal antibodies directed against e arly and late CMV antigens. A retrospective selection was made of 23 s pecimens with viral inclusion bodies in cytomegalic cells (group A) to characterise the most frequently associated histological pattern, and of 34 other specimens without viral inclusion bodies (group B) but wi th the same microscopic features as group A. Re-cuts from both specime n groups were studied using immunohistochemistry and ISH with a CMV sp ecific complementary DNA probe. Results-CMV infection was confirmed in 35 specimens (29 by immunohistochemistry, 23 by presence of inclusion bodies in haematoxylin and eosin stained sections, 16 by ISH) from 27 patients (incidence 16.9%). CMV hepatitis was diagnosed within 46+/-1 9 (range 21-114) days posttransplant. Twenty one (91.3%) of the 23 bio psy specimens with inclusion bodies (group A) displayed heterogeneous inflammatory foci disseminated throughout the hepatic lobule. Nineteen specimens (82.6%) were positive by immunohistochemistry and 14 (60.9% ) by ISH. In eight (23.5%) of the 34 group B specimens CMV infection w as confirmed by immunohistochemistry (n=6) or ISH (n=2). Another 12 (3 5.3%) of the group B specimens negative on staining with haematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry and ISH came from allografts in which previous or subsequent biopsy specimens were CMV positive. Conclusions -Demonstration of cytomegalic inclusion bodies in haematoxylin and eos in sections is sufficient for a diagnosis of CMV hepatitis. The routin e use of immunohistochemistry in all allograft biopsy specimens in mor e sensitive than demonstration of inclusion bodies by staining with ha ematoxylin and eosin but may yield false negative results because of t he focal distribution of positive cells. ISH was less sensitive than s taining with haematoxylin and eosin and/or immunohistochemistry. A his tological picture of ''disseminated focal hepatitis'' without viral in clusion bodies selects a group of allograft biopsy specimens in which immunohistochemistry and/or ISH may improve detection of CMV.