As. Handler et Bj. Turnock, LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT EFFECTIVENESS IN ADDRESSING THE CORE FUNCTIONS OF PUBLIC-HEALTH - ESSENTIAL INGREDIENTS, Journal of public health policy, 17(4), 1996, pp. 460-483
Objectives: Objective 8.14 of the U.S. Healthy People 2000 objectives
calls for 90%; of the population to be served by a local health depart
ment (LHD) which is effectively carrying out the core functions of pub
lic health (assessment, policy development, assurance). This study see
ks to describe the structural and service characteristics of an effect
ive LHD. Methods: Data from a 1993 national random sample survey of LH
D practice were merged with data from the 1992-1993 National Associati
on of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) profile of local healt
h agencies. Using a definition of effectiveness related to the core fu
nctions of public health, the correlates of effectiveness were examine
d for 264 health departments in the matched sample. Results: Effective
ness of local health agencies was not related to jurisdiction size or
type. Inputs (structural factors) associated with effectiveness includ
ed having a full-time agency head, a larger budget derived from a grea
ter number of funding sources, and a larger number of staff. With resp
ect to outputs (services), effective health departments were also more
likely to provide a greater number of services directly particularly
personal preventive and treatment services. Conclusions: Only a few in
puts are correlated with core-function related effectiveness. However,
a profile of an effective health department emerges. Effective LHDs a
ppear more likely to have full-time leadership which is able to tap di
verse funding sources to provide the mix and match of community and pe
rsonal prevention and treatment services needed to address community n
eeds and improve the public's health.