Jhj. Allum et al., DIFFERENTIAL CONTROL OF LEG AND TRUNK MUSCLE-ACTIVITY BY VESTIBULOSPINAL AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE SIGNALS DURING HUMAN BALANCE CORRECTIONS, Acta oto-laryngologica, 115(2), 1995, pp. 124-129
Knowledge about how proprioceptive signals trigger and modulate human
balance corrections has important implications for the rehabilitation
of postural and gait disorders, and increases our understanding of nor
mal interactions between these sensory systems. We used combinations o
f support-surface rotation and rearward translation to examine the tri
ggering effects of ankle and knee movements on balance corrections. By
comparing the responses in normal subjects to those in persons with a
bilateral peripheral vestibular deficit, we determined the modulating
influence of vestibular inputs on balance responses. Differences in n
ormal and vestibular-loss responses under the different proprioceptive
conditions revealed four general findings. First, ventral leg muscle
responses are strongly modulated by vestibule-spinal inputs and by pro
prioceptive inputs from the ankle and knee. Second, triceps surae musc
le responses are initially dependent on ankle inputs, and after 100 ms
are modulated by knee inputs; they are not altered by vestibular loss
. Third, paraspinal responses in vestibular-loss subjects are enhanced
because of unstable trunk sway induced by the lack of ventral leg-mus
cle activity. Fourth, the earliest possible triggering signal for esta
blishing the timing of interlink muscle activity appears to be knee fl
exion and/or trunk rotation on the pelvis. These results indicate that
a confluence of knee and trunk proprioceptive and vestibule-spinal in
puts, rather than either input alone, is involved in establishing the
muscle synergy underlying normal balance corrections.