Techniques of simulated patients, feedback and role play were combined
to compare in a randomized, controlled design two methods of teaching
interviewing skills to senior medical students. Over a six-month peri
od senior medical students enrolled in the ambulatory medicine clerksh
ip were entered into the study. Students were randomized into two grou
ps. Group 1 (n = 20) students became simulated patients and were inter
viewed by two sophomore students, providing the sophomores with feedba
ck on technique. Group 2 (n = 29) students practiced the interviewing
skills in role play with faculty tutoring. Students in both groups per
formed before and after videotaped interviews with simulated patients.
All video tapes were rated for technique, using the Arizona Clinical
Interview Rating Scale. Results show statistically significant improve
ment in interview skills in each group, Group 1 (mean(1) = 3.10, mean(
2) = 3.81, p = 0.0001) and Group 2 (mean(1) = 3.04, mean(2) = 3.66, p
= 0.0001). There is no significant difference between the two groups.
With a 30% savings in faculty time, it has been demonstrated that seni
or students can improve their interviewing skills as well by providing
feedback to sophomores as they can by using role play.