Five studies are reported whose aim was to assess whether in undergrad
uates analogical transfer of a solution strategy from a source story t
o an isomorphic target problem in a different domain is associated wit
h individual differences in reasoning ability, cognitive style, academ
ic curricula, and gender. In Study 1 there were no relationships betwe
en analogical problem solving and Raven's Progressive Matrices. Study
2 showed that field-independent subjects were more likely to be analog
ical solvers than field-dependent subjects. Study 3 failed to support
the notion of a link between analogical transfer and right-left and ve
rbal-visual styles of thinking. There was evidence that rates of analo
gical solutions were higher in adaptors than in innovators (Study 4) a
nd in bio-medical than in humanities students (Study 5). Males tended
to give analogical solutions more frequently than females. Results sug
gest that cognitive styles, rather than abilities, are involved in ana
logical problem solving.