INHIBITION OF HUMAN 5-PHOSPHORIBOSYL-1-PYROPHOSPHATE SYNTHETASE BY YLAMINO)PYUIMIDO[5,4-D]PYRIMIDINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE - EVIDENCE FOR INTERACTION AT THE ADP ALLOSTERIC SITE
Dw. Fry et al., INHIBITION OF HUMAN 5-PHOSPHORIBOSYL-1-PYROPHOSPHATE SYNTHETASE BY YLAMINO)PYUIMIDO[5,4-D]PYRIMIDINE-5'-MONOPHOSPHATE - EVIDENCE FOR INTERACTION AT THE ADP ALLOSTERIC SITE, Molecular pharmacology, 47(4), 1995, pp. 810-815
The kinetics of inhibition by the aminopyrimidopyrimidine nucleotide o
-8-(beta-D-ribofuranosylamino)pyrimido[5,4-d]pyri midine-5'-monophosph
ate (APP-MP) were assessed with two human isozymes of 5-phosphoribosyl
-1-pyrophosphate synthetase (PRS) (PRS1 and PRS2) and a mutant enzyme,
S.M. PRS1, derived from an individual with PRS hyperactivity. In the
presence of 1 mM potassium phosphate, APP-MP inhibited PRS1 and PRS2 w
ith half-maximal inhibition (IC50) at 5.2 mu M and 23.8 mu M, respecti
vely. The degree of inhibition for both enzymes was highly dependent o
n the phosphate concentration; IC50 values were 70 times higher in the
presence of 50 mM potassium phosphate. APP-MP exhibited mixed noncomp
etitive-uncompetitive inhibition against PRS1, with a K-il value of 6.
1 mu M and a K-is value of 14.6 mu M, and produced parabolic secondary
plots of slope or intercept versus APP-MP concentration. In compariso
n, inhibition of PRS1 by ADP was of a mixed noncompetitive-competitive
type, with a K-il value of 9.6 mu M and a K-is value of 2.8 mu M. A s
imilar kinetic analysis was completed using S.M. PRS1, a mutant enzyme
with a single amino acid substitution resulting in diminished sensiti
vity to feedback inhibition by nucleotides. The noncompetitive compone
nt of ADP inhibition of PRS1 was absent with S.M. PRS1 and ADP inhibit
ion was purely competitive, with a K-i of 6.4 mu M. APP-MP was a very
poor inhibitor of S.M. PRS1, displaying uncompetitive characteristics
and a K-i of 1.6 mM. These data indicate that APP-MP inhibits PRS1 wit
h a strong element of noncompetitive inhibition and appears to interac
t specifically at the allosteric site used by ADP. These results contr
ast with those obtained with ADP, which has a strong component of ATP
competitive inhibition and binds at the ATP site as well as at a secon
d, allosteric, site.