The author contests the orthodox view that conflicts between the narro
w interests of individual states, on the one hand, and an orderly glob
al trading system, on the other, are bound to arise frequently. He ide
ntifies the roots of this view in the mercantilist approach to economi
c interaction among states that has dominated the classic internationa
l relations perspective on trade, and shows how the justification for
the mercantilist stance is founded on a false equivalence of the inter
ests of the state with the interests of individuals. Contrasting merca
ntilism with liberalism, he argues that the EU's international liberal
ism, as evidenced by its development of the single market, is in sharp
contrast to its mercantilist policy towards all beyond its borders.