Ec. Nelson et al., PERFORMANCE-MEASURES AND MEASUREMENT - REPORT CARDS OR INSTRUMENT PANELS - WHO NEEDS WHAT, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 21(4), 1995, pp. 155-166
Background: The report card movement in health care is a positive resp
onse to legitimate customer needs and requirements for comparative inf
ormation on quality and costs. At the same time, providers have a legi
timate concern about potential problems with gathering and using valid
data in a prudent manner. Report cards have problems that often detra
ct from their potentially constructive uses. in response to this conce
rn, the authors propose that instrument panels-a newer concept in heal
th care-compared to the static, judgmental image of report cards proje
ct an action-oriented, decision-making image. Examples: Descriptions a
re given of three types of instrument panels based on work in progress
in the Dartmouth-Hitchcock health care system, a regional, integrated
delivery system that serves the population of New Hampshire and parts
of Vermont and Massachusetts: a 450-physician group practice (The Hit
chcock Clinic), which provides more than one million visits per year i
n more than 25 locations; a tertiary health care facility (Mary Hitchc
ock Memorial Hospital) with more than 300,000 patient days; and a prep
aid health plan (Matthew Thornton Health Plan) with approximately 120,
000 members. Summary: It would be wise and efficient for providers to
design instrument panel data collection systems that can feed directly
into report cards, leading to the triple benefit of enhancing accurac
y, reducing total costs, and increasing overall utility to both provid
ers and their customers.