Studies of variation in male mating success within populations have be
en instrumental in shaping perspectives of the role of female choice i
n sexual selection. We present simple models to quantify the potential
contributions to such variation from a variety of processes: average
male mating success (equivalent to the number of female matings per ma
le), variation in male and territory quality, male attendance times at
leks, and degree of female synchrony, aggregation, and copying. If ma
tings occur by chance, we expect variance in male mating success to in
crease proportionately with mean mating success. Increasing average ma
ting success results in a superproportionate increase in variance when
males or their territories differ in quality, when males differ in ti
me spent at the lek, when females copy each other, or when females agg
regate and mate as a group. In contrast, when females arrive in synchr
ony there is a subproportionate increase in variance with respect to m
ean male mating success. A review of 36 field studies from 20 species
indicates that all studied leks exhibit greater variance in male matin
g success than expected by chance. Furthermore, the slope of a regress
ion between variance and mean success is significantly greater than un
ity, as predicted by the models of variation in male quality, attendan
ce at leks, female aggregation, and female copying. In studies of four
leks in which we were able to partition the component of variance att
ributable to differences among males in attendance at leks, approximat
ely 60% of the variance remained unexplained and was attributable to f
emale copying, aggregation, or variation in male quality. The framewor
k presented here allows a quantified breakdown of variation among male
s in mating success and facilitates comparisons among studies of the p
otential for sexual selection.