Background and aims of the study: The traditional method of aortic val
ve replacement with a homograft has been free-hand insertion in the su
bcoronary position. Recently, total root replacement has become increa
singly popular. We present our experiences with both methods in this s
tudy. Material and methods: Between January 1, 1987 and March 31, 1996
, 208 patients underwent homograft replacement of the aortic valve (fr
ee-hand subcoronary technique, n = 147 and root replacement, n = 61).
The age of the patients ranged between 1.5 and 78 years with a mean ag
e of 41 years. There were 55 females and 153 males, Ninety-four patien
ts had infected aortic root (with 47 ring abscesses) and 114 patients
had sterile aortic roots. In these series, patients with small aortic
root, complicated endocarditis, dilated aortic annulus and aneurysm re
ceived aortic root replacement. Results: The hospital mortality of pat
ients with noninfected and infected roots was 2.6% and 8.5% respective
ly making an overall hospital mortality of 5.2%. In patients with free
-hand subcoronary valve implantation (AVR) and root replacement (ARR)
techniques the hospital mortality was 3.4% and 9.8% respectively. The
major risk factor for death was New York Heart Association functional
class IV with sepsis. Eight years patient survival in patients with AV
R and ARR was 95% +/- 2% and 86% +/- 4% respectively. Freedom from str
uctural deterioration in patients with AVR and ARR was 96.5% +/- 2% an
d 98% +/- 3% whereas freedom from reoperation was identical 94% +/- 2%
and 93% +/- 4% respectively. However, the incidence of reoperation in
patients under 40 years of age, particularly in children (<16 years o
f age) during the eight years' follow up was 27%, The rate of recurren
t endocarditis was 3.6% in ARR patients and development of postoperati
ve pseudoaneurysm formation occurred in 1.4% of AVR patients with endo
carditis. Conclusion: In conclusion, ARR technique provides low rate o
f reoperation in the early postoperative period. Cryopreserved homogra
fts in the subcoronary position in adult patients <40 years of age sho
wed excellent medium term durability and hemodynamic performance provi
ding evidence that long term outcome with a meticulous subcoronary imp
lantation technique is comparable to that with the ARR technique.