MESOTHELIOMA - IS ASBESTOS EXPOSURE THE ONLY CAUSE

Authors
Citation
Rt. Gun, MESOTHELIOMA - IS ASBESTOS EXPOSURE THE ONLY CAUSE, Medical journal of Australia, 162(8), 1995, pp. 429-431
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
0025729X
Volume
162
Issue
8
Year of publication
1995
Pages
429 - 431
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-729X(1995)162:8<429:M-IAET>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Background: Although a causal association between mesothelioma and occ upational exposure to asbestos is beyond dispute, nearly all populatio n-based studies of mesothelioma have found some proportion of cases wi th no history of asbestos exposure. Data: Incidences of mesothelioma i n men and women not occupationally exposed to asbestos for the period 1980-1985 were generated from: (i) estimates of occupational exposure to asbestos in the general male population, obtained from population-b ased controls in a case-control study of incident cancer in South Aust ralia; and (ii) National Mesothelioma Surveillance Program data. The i ncidence in men not occupationally exposed was 8.5 per 1 000 000 perso n-years, compared with 2.6 per 1 000 000 person-years in women, a diff erence of 5.9 per 1 000 000 person-years (90% confidence interval, 4.8 -7.2). Conclusion: Mesothelioma without a history of asbestos exposure may be caused by asbestos in the general environment, but this fails to explain why such cases occur more commonly in men. Alternative expl anations include the existence of another independent cause of mesothe lioma, or of a co-factor which, combined with ''environmental'' levels of asbestos exposure, constitutes a sufficient cause. Such a risk fac tor is likely to be occupational, in which case mesothelioma may be ex pected to occur even after occupational asbestos exposures have been e liminated.