To validate a previously suggested dosing regimen of aminophylline adm
inistration for Thai children(1), we enrolled 13 asthmatic Thai childr
en (5 girls and 8 boys) between the ages of 7.5-13.4 years (mean = 10.
4 years) into a 36-hour, multiple-dose, oral theophylline pharmacokine
tic study using plain aminophylline tablets at a dosage of 5 mg of the
ophylline base/kg every 8 hours. All patients were studied in the stea
dy state. Blood samples were obtained every 2 hours for 24 hours; ther
eafter, samples were obtained more frequently for another 12 hours to
determine theophylline pharmacokinetic parameters. Serum theophylline
concentrations (STC) were assayed with a fluorescence polarization imm
unoassay method (TDX). Significant interpatient variations in STCs wer
e observed. Five patients had peak STCs in the toxic range (>20 mu g/m
l). Most patients had reproducible STC patterns during the study perio
d; however, marked variations of STCs were observed with a mean percen
t of fluctuations {(Cmax-Cmin)/Cmin 100} of 535.6%. Using the PC Nonl
in computer interpolation program by a modification with a baseline de
cay method and the Lagrange polynominal interpolation technique, appro
ximate pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and the results were
as follows: plasma half life (t1/2) = 3.08 hours, elimination rate co
nstant (Kel) = 0.26 hour(-1), absorption rate constant (Ka) = 2.21 hou
r(-1), volume of distribution (Vd) = 0.23 l/kg and plasma clearance (C
I) = 56 ml/kg/hour. Since these calculated parameters could be impreci
se due to delayed absorption of oral theophylline dosages, a single-do
se intravenous theophylline pharmacokinetic study was further examined
in another 13 patients (age range = 7-12 years, mean = 8.9 years) to
determine more accurate pharmacokinetic data using intravenous aminoph
ylline at dosage of 5.8 mg/kg. Data derived from this part of the stud
y were t1/2 = 4.25 hours, Kel = 0.19 hour(-1), Vd = 0.44 l/kg, Clp = 9
0 ml/kg/hour and a mean residence time (MRT) of 5.84 hours. From these
data, we conclude that theophylline pharmacokinetic data in this grou
p of Thai children did not differ significantly form Caucasian childre
n in the same age range. We therefore suggest that the routine dose re
gimen as recommended for Caucasian children in this age group may be a
pplicable to Thai children as well.