MORAL OVERTONES OF FOOD - JUDGMENTS OF OTHERS BASED ON WHAT THEY EAT

Citation
Ri. Stein et Cj. Nemeroff, MORAL OVERTONES OF FOOD - JUDGMENTS OF OTHERS BASED ON WHAT THEY EAT, Personality & social psychology bulletin, 21(5), 1995, pp. 480-490
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Social
ISSN journal
01461672
Volume
21
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
480 - 490
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-1672(1995)21:5<480:MOOF-J>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Previous research found that meal size can affect judgments of eaters' attractiveness and femininity. The present study investigates whether eating specific types of foods-namely, healthy, nonfattening foods ve rsus unhealthy, fattening ones-gives rise to moral judgments about the eaters. Subjects were presented with one of four bogus profiles of a person, which differed only in gender and foods consumed. Subjects rat ed the target on morality; potential mechanisms of effects were also e xplored. Results confirmed the hypothesis that moral judgments of othe rs differ depending on the foods they eat. This result was not simply due to a halo effect but was explained by two mediational mechanisms: the Puritan ethic and the ''you are what you eat'' principle. However, the effect did not show predicted moderation by subject or target gen der, or restrained-eating status. Foods also seemed to influence subje cts' perceptions of fitness and weight information about the target.