Objective. To extend the validity of the Shoulder Pain and Disability
Index (SPADI) by (1) making it suitable for telephone administration;
(2) determining its convergent validity with other health status measu
res; and (3) assessing the responsiveness of the SPADI to clinical cha
nge. Methods, Consecutive primary care patients with shoulder discomfo
rt were followed for 3 months. At enrollment, a detailed shoulder spec
ific history was obtained by a trained research assistant, and the Hea
lth Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Medical Outcomes Study SF-20 (
SF-20), and numeric and visual analog versions of the SPADI were compl
eted by the patient. At 2, 4, and 12 weeks the numeric scaled SPADI wa
s administered by telephone and patients rated globally the change in
shoulder discomfort. Results, One hundred and two subjects were enroll
ed; 96 completed at least one followup assessment and 75 completed all
followup assessments. Subjects were men (98%), predominantly white (7
3%), with a median age of 60 years, and the majority had experienced s
houlder discomfort for >3 months (66%). At baseline the visual analog
(VAS) and numeric scaled SPADI were highly concordant (intraclass corr
elation coefficient = 0.86), and the SPADI correlated substantially wi
th the HAQ (r = 0.61) and the physical functioning (r = -0.50) and pai
n (r = -0.43) domains of the SF-20, The SPADI(triangle) (baseline - fo
llowup) discriminated accurately between subjects who improved versus
those who stayed the same or worsened [receiver operating characterist
ic cure, (ROC) = 0.91, likelihood ratio for improvement = 34]. Conclus
ion. The numerically scaled SPADI is highly correlated with the origin
al VAS version of the SPADI and other measures of health status. The S
PADI is responsive to change and accurately discriminates among patien
ts who are improved or worsened.