Sc. Goodwin et al., PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT HEMOBILIA DURING PLACEMENT OF TRANSHEPATIC BILIARY DRAINAGE CATHETERS - TECHNIQUE MODIFICATION AND INITIAL RESULTS, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology, 6(2), 1995, pp. 229-232
PURPOSE: The authors evaluated a technique for the prevention of signi
ficant hemobilia during placement of transhepatic biliary drainage cat
heters (TBDCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with strictures
were randomized to two groups. In the control group, the biliary tree
was accessed with an Accustick system and a TBDC was placed routinely.
In the experimental group, following initial access, a rotating hemos
tatic valve was attached and the outer sheath was pulled back over the
wire while contrast material was injected. If a major vascular struct
ure was encountered, the tract was not used for TBDC placement. Howeve
r, the outer sheath was re-advanced and used to opacify the ducts. Thi
s facilitated separate access. Once access was achieved without traver
sing a major vascular structure, a TBDC was placed, and the Accustick
system was removed. If a portal vein or hepatic vein branch was traver
sed, no additional maneuvers were performed. However, if a branch of t
he hepatic artery had been traversed, the tract and biliary-arterial f
istula were embolized with gelatin sponge pledgets. Both groups were e
valuated for hemobilia for 6 weeks. RESULTS: In the control group, the
re were three cases of significant hemobilia; two were mild, one was s
evere. In the experimental group, the tract communicated with a major
vascular structure in three patients. In these patients, a second acce
ss was used for TBDC placement. None of the patients in the experiment
al group experienced significant hemobilia. CONCLUSION: Visualization
prevents the usage of tracts that communicate with large vascular stru
ctures. Initial results indicate that this reduces the frequency of si
gnificant hemobilia when TBDCs are placed.