R. Hilhorst et al., PROTEIN EXTRACTION FROM AN AQUEOUS-PHASE INTO A REVERSED MICELLAR PHASE - EFFECT OF WATER-CONTENT AND REVERSED MICELLAR COMPOSITION, Biotechnology and bioengineering, 46(4), 1995, pp. 375-387
In the system composed of the cationic surfactant TOMAC (10 mM), the n
onionic (co)surfactant Rewopal HV5 (2 mM), and octanol (0.1% v/v) in i
sooctane, reversed micelles are formed upon contact with an aqueous ph
ase containing 50 mM ethylene diamine, alpha-Amylase can be transferre
d from the aqueous phase into reversed micelles in the pH range 9.5 to
10.5 and re-extracted into a second aqueous phase of different compos
ition. The size of the reversed micelles (as reflected in the water co
ntent of the organic phase) can be varied by changes in percentage of
octanol, type of counterion in the aqueous phase, or in the number of
ethoxylate head groups of the nonionic surfactant. An increase in size
results in transfer at lower pH values. Experiments in which the char
ge density in the reversed micellar interface was changed by incorpora
tion of charged derivatives of the nonionic surfactant, without influe
ncing the water content, revealed that an increased charge density fac
ilitated transfer, resulting in a broader transfer profile. Replacemen
t of TOMAC by other quaternary ammonium surfactants differing in numbe
r and length of tails revealed that, of the 14 surfactants tested, onl
y 2 gave appreciable amounts of transfer. The amount of transfer is re
lated to the dynamics of phase separation of the surfactants: those gi
ving a poor phase separation inactivate the enzyme. This inactivation
is caused by electrostatic interactions between the charged surfactant
head groups and charged groups on the enzyme. Electrostatic interacti
ons are the first step of transfer, and can result in either incorpora
tion in a reversed micelle, or, if reversed micelle formation is slow,
in enzyme inactivation. (C) 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.