DEVELOPMENT AND COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHICMETHODS WITH TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRIC AND ULTRAVIOLET ABSORBENCY DETECTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CYCLOBENZAPRINE IN HUMAN PLASMA AND URINE

Citation
M. Constanzer et al., DEVELOPMENT AND COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHICMETHODS WITH TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRIC AND ULTRAVIOLET ABSORBENCY DETECTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CYCLOBENZAPRINE IN HUMAN PLASMA AND URINE, Journal of chromatography B. Biomedical applications, 666(1), 1995, pp. 117-126
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical
Journal title
Journal of chromatography B. Biomedical applications
ISSN journal
15726495 → ACNP
Volume
666
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
117 - 126
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Sensitive assays for the determination of cyclobenzaprine (I) in human plasma and urine were developed utilizing high-performance liquid chr omatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometric (MS-MS) and ultravio let (UV) absorbance detections. These two analytical techniques were e valuated for reliability and sensitivity, and applied to support pharm acokinetic studies. Both methods employed a liquid-liquid extraction o f the compound from basified biological sample. The organic extract wa s evaporated to dryness, the residue was reconstituted in the mobile p hase and injected onto the HPLC system. The HPLC assay with MS-MS dete ction was performed on a PE Sciex API III tandem mass spectrometer usi ng the heated nebulizer interface. Multiple reaction monitoring using the parent --> daughter ion combinations of mit 276 -->, 215 and 296 - -> 208 was used to quantitate I and internal standard (II), respective ly. The HPLC-MS-MS and HPLC-UV assays were validated in human plasma i n the concentration range 0.1-50 ng/ml and 0.5-50 ng/ml, respectively. In urine, both methods were validated in the concentration range 10-1 000 ng/ml. The precision of the assays, as expressed as coefficients o f variation (C.V.) was less than 10% over the entire concentration ran ge, with adequate assay specificity and accuracy. In addition to bette r sensitivity, the HPLC-MS-MS assay was more efficient and allowed ana lysis of more biological fluid samples in a single working day than th e HPLC-UV method.