Eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS), was defined by the Centers for Di
sease Control (CDC) as eosinophilia > 1000 mm(3) and incapacitating my
algia without infection or neoplasm. Studies suggested that use of L-t
ryptophan (L-T), was a risk factor. We conducted a pharmacoepidemiolog
ical survey in Canada where access to L-T is limited. Using the active
surveillance method, a 100% sample of potentially involved specialist
s and a 15% sample of family physicians from Ontario and Quebec were s
urveyed regarding treatment of patients with severe myalgia within the
past year. Follow-up amplified clinical and laboratory information. O
verall response rates were 61.4%. Thirty-eight per cent of respondents
reported at least one patient. Of 6423 patients assessed, 19 'definit
e' and 25 'possible' EMS cases were identified. Information from physi
cians did not suggest use of L-T in patients with definite or possible
EMS. It was considered that the cases found an underestimate of the i
ncidence of EMS. Its continuing occurrence in Canada brings causal int
erepretations of earlier studies into question.