Th. Grenby, THE USE OF SANGUINARINE IN MOUTHWASHES AND TOOTHPASTE COMPARED WITH SOME OTHER ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, British Dental Journal, 178(7), 1995, pp. 254-258
Dental practitioners say that they get information to answer patients'
queries on mouthwashes chiefly from their studies in periodontology a
nd from articles in the British Dental Journal, Most practitioners who
were asked about this knew of the benefits of Corsodyl (chlorhexidine
) and fluoride-containing rinses, but few were aware of the active ing
redients and effectiveness of the wide range of mouthwashes now on the
market. The majority said they would welcome more information on this
. This review was undertaken because there was a move to introduce mou
thwashes containing sanguinarine into the UK. Part of its appeal would
be that it is a natural therapeutic product, as distinct from a 'synt
hetic' or 'artificial' chemical. Information collected from scientific
publications on sanguinarine, which has been in use in the USA and on
the Continent in mouthwashes and toothpastes, is presented here. The
consensus is that(a) it has some assets in curbing supragingival plaqu
e, although it is uncertain whether the presence of zinc salts assists
this, and (b) it is more effective in a mouthwash than in a toothpast
e. It appears to be less effective than chlorhexidine, but no direct c
omparisons with triclosan preparations have been discovered. Like othe
r mouthwashes, it does not affect subgingival plaque.