SENSITIVITY OF GALAXY CLUSTER MORPHOLOGIES TO OMEGA(0) AND P(K)

Authors
Citation
Da. Buote et Gh. Xu, SENSITIVITY OF GALAXY CLUSTER MORPHOLOGIES TO OMEGA(0) AND P(K), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 284(2), 1997, pp. 439-456
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Astronomy & Astrophysics
ISSN journal
00358711
Volume
284
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
439 - 456
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-8711(1997)284:2<439:SOGCMT>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
We examine the sensitivity of the spatial morphologies of galaxy clust ers to Omega(0) and P(k) using high-resolution N-body simulations with a large dynamic range. Variants of the standard cold dark matter (CDM ) model are considered having different spatial curvatures, SCDM (Omeg a(0) = 1), OCDM (Omega(0) = 0.35), and LCDM (Omega(0) = 0.35, lambda(0 ) = 0.65) and different normalizations, sigma(8). We also explore crit ical density models with different spectral indices, n, of the scale-f ree power spectrum P (k) proportional to k(n). Cluster X-ray morpholog ies are quantified with power ratios (PRs), where we take for the X-ra y emissivity j(gas) proportional to rho(DM)(2), which we argue is a su itable approximation for an analysis X-ray emissivity j(gas) proportio nal to rho(DM)(2), of PRs. We find that Omega(0) primarily influences the means of the PR distributions, whereas the power spectrum (n and s igma(8)) primarily affects their variances: log(10)(P-3/P-0) is the cl eanest probe of Omega(0), since its mean is very sensitive to Omega(0) but very insensitive to P(k). The PR means easily distinguish the SCD M and OCDM models, while the SCDM and LCDM means show a more modest, b ut significant, difference (similar to 3 sigma). The OCDM and LCDM mod els are largely indistinguishable in terms of the PRs. Finally, we com pare these models to a sample of ROSAT clusters and find that the PR m eans of the SCDM clusters exceed the ROSAT means with a high formal le vel of significance (similar to 4 sigma). Though the formal significan ce level of this rho(DM)(2)/X-ray comparison should be considered only approximate, we argue that taking into account the hydrodynamics and cooling will not reconcile a discrepancy this large. The PR means of t he OCDM clusters are consistent, and the means of the LCDM clusters ar e marginally consistent, with those of the ROSAT clusters. Thus, we co nclude that cluster morphologies strongly disfavour Omega = 1 CDM mode ls while favouring low density CDM models (Omega(0) = 0.35) with or wi thout a cosmological constant.