Jm. Quillan et W. Sadee, STRUCTURE-BASED SEARCH FOR PEPTIDE LIGANDS THAT CROSS-REACT WITH MELANOCORTIN RECEPTORS, Pharmaceutical research, 13(11), 1996, pp. 1624-1630
Purpose. To define sequence motifs that can be used to identify peptid
e ligands of the melanocortin receptor (MCR). Methods. Screening of co
mbinatorial libraries has led to identification of D-Trp-Nle-NH2 (Nle,
norleucine) and D-TrpArg-NH2 as the smallest structures known to anta
gonize the amphibian MCR (1). As the basis of a search paradigm, pepti
de-ligands containing these or similar motifs within their larger prim
ary structure were examined for ability to antagonize amphibian and re
combinant human MCRs. Compounds examined include analogs of substance
P, leutinizing-hormone releasing-hormone, endothelin, neurotensin, and
opioid-somatostatin. Results. Of seven compounds tested containing th
e predetermined search motif D-Trp-AA(x) (where AA(x) is Arg, Leu, Ile
, or ne), six were found to have previously unrecognized antagonist ac
tivity at the amphibian MCR (K-d 30 to 5000 nM). In contrast, of 14 si
milar control peptides lacking the D-Trp-AA(x), search motif, only som
atostatin displayed measurable antagonist potency. The anticancer pept
ide, [Arg(8), D-Trp(7,9), N-methyl-Phe(8)]-substance P, was the most p
otent of the motif-containing peptides with a K-d of 31 nM. The mu-opi
oid antagonist D-Phecyclic[Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen]-Thr-NH2 (CTAP) a
lso blocked the amphibian MCR (K-d 1 mu M), but the related mu-antagon
ist CTOP, different only by only by substitution of Arg with ornithine
within the search motif, was found to agonize the amphibian MCR (EC(5
0) 67 nM). CTAP and the anticancer peptide were also tested on human M
CRs (hMCRs); while CTAP competed with alpha-MSH at the hMCl receptor,
the anticancer peptide had no effect or was slightly stimulatory. Conc
lusions. We have identified dipeptide motifs that help distinguish ant
agonist ligands of the amphibian MCR from ligands known to interact wi
th other, G-protein coupled receptors. ?his approach might be generall
y applicable if motifs can identified for other receptors and their su
btypes. In studies employing CTAP and CTOP, analogs previously conside
red highly selective for the mu-opioid receptor, crossreaction with MC
Rs must be considered.