THE RATIONALE TO SWITCH FROM POSTOPERATIVE HYPERFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED RADIOTHERAPY TO PREOPERATIVE HYPERFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED RADIOTHERAPY IN RECTAL-CANCER
Pa. Coucke et al., THE RATIONALE TO SWITCH FROM POSTOPERATIVE HYPERFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED RADIOTHERAPY TO PREOPERATIVE HYPERFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED RADIOTHERAPY IN RECTAL-CANCER, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 32(1), 1995, pp. 181-188
Citations number
56
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of preoperative Hyperfractiona
ted Accelerated RadioTherapy (preop-HART) in rectal cancer and to expl
ain the rationales to switch from postoperative HART to preoperative H
ART. Methods and Materials: Fifty-two consecutive patients were introd
uced in successive Phase I trials since 1989. In trial 89-01, postoper
ative HART (48 Gy in 3 weeks) was applied in 20 patients, In nine pati
ents with locally advanced rectal cancer, considered unresectable by t
he surgeon, 32 Gy in 2 weeks was applied prior to surgery (trial 89-02
), Since 1991, 41.6 Gy in 2.5 weeks has been applied preoperatively to
23 patients with T3-T4 any N rectal cancer immediately followed by su
rgery (trial 91-01), All patients were irradiated at the department of
radiation-oncology with a four-field box technique (1.6 Gy twice a da
y and with at least a 6-h interval between fractions), The minimal acc
elerating potential was 6 MV, Acute toxicity was scored according to t
he World Health Organization (WHO for skin and small bowel) and the Ra
diation Therapy Oncology Group criteria (RTOG for bladder), This was d
one weekly during treatment and every 3 months thereafter, Small bowel
volume was estimated by a modified ''Gallagher's'' method. Results: A
cute toxicity was acceptable both in postoperative and preoperative se
tup, The mean acute toxicity was significantly lower in trial 91-01 co
mpared to 89-01, This difference was due to the smaller amount of smal
l bowel in irradiation field and lower total dose in trial 91-01, More
over, there was a significantly reduced delay between surgery and radi
otherapy favoring trial 91-01 (median delay 4 days compared to 46 days
in trial 89-01), Nearly all patients in trial 89-02 and 91-01 underwe
nt surgery (31 out of 32; 97%), Resection margins were negative in 29
out of 32, Hospitalization duration in trial 91-01 was not significant
ly different from trial 89-01 (19 vs, 21 days, respectively). Conclusi
ons: Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy immediately followed b
y surgery is feasible as far as acute toxicity is concerned, Preoperat
ive HART is favored by a significantly lower acute toxicity related, i
n part, to a smaller amount of irradiated small bowel, and a shorter d
uration of the delay between radiotherapy and surgery, Moreover, the h
ospital stay after preoperative HART is not significantly increased.