ROLE OF THE INNER-SPHERE REORGANIZATION IN THE PHOTOINDUCED ELECTRON-TRANSFER REACTION OF RU(II) COMPLEXES CONTAINING IMINE C=N OR AZO N=N DOUBLE-BONDS IN THE LIGANDS
M. Masuyama et Y. Kaizu, ROLE OF THE INNER-SPHERE REORGANIZATION IN THE PHOTOINDUCED ELECTRON-TRANSFER REACTION OF RU(II) COMPLEXES CONTAINING IMINE C=N OR AZO N=N DOUBLE-BONDS IN THE LIGANDS, Journal of physical chemistry, 99(16), 1995, pp. 6152-6162
Photoinduced oxidative and reductive electron transfer (ET) reactions
of excited Ru(imin)(3)(2+) (imin = 2-(N-methylformimidoyl)pyridine), R
u(imin)(2)(CN)(2), and Ru(azpy)(3)(2+) (azpy = 2-(phenylazo)pyridine),
where imin and azpy contain imine C=N and azo N=N double bonds, respe
ctively, with organic quenchers were investigated in acetonitrile solu
tions, and their Delta G dependencies of the quenching rate constants
(k(q)) were compared with those of Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridi
ne) and Ru(L)(2)(CN)(2) complexes where L = 4,4'- or 5,5'-dmbpy (dmbpy
= dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine) and phen (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline). Th
e oxidative quenching rate constants of Ru(imin)(3)(2+) and Ru(imin)(2
)(CN)(2) are smaller than those of the corresponding bpy, dmbpy, and p
hen complexes at the same Delta G value in the normal region. However,
the Delta G dependencies of the reductive quenching rate constants of
Ru(imin)(3)(2+) and Ru(azpy)(3)(2+) coincide with that of the corresp
onding bpy complex. The inner-sphere reorganization (lambda(in)) cause
d by the deformation of the C=N bond of imin is considered to be the m
ain reason for the disadvantage of ET in the normal region of the oxid
ative ET reactions of excited Ru(imin)(3)(2+) and Ru(imin)(2)(CN)(2).
On the other hand, the deformation of the C=N and N=N bonds of Ru(imin
)(3)(2+) and Ru(azpy)(3)(2+) is absent in the reductive ET reactions.
The factors which govern these oxidative and reductive ET reactions ar
e discussed and compared with other donor-acceptor systems.