A. Faas et al., A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EXERCISE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN - EFFICACY ON SICKNESS ABSENCE, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 20(8), 1995, pp. 941-947
Study Design. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which patients
received either usual care by a general practitioner (information and
analgesics), or placebo physiotherapy given by a physiotherapist, or
exercise therapy given by a physiotherapist. Objective. To assess the
efficacy of exercise therapy on sickness absence from work in patients
with acute low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Exercise therap
y during the nonchronic phase of back pain is considered to reduce sic
kness absence, but this opinion is controversial. Methods. Patients wi
th acute nonspecific low back pain and a paid job were included for an
alysis. Sickness absence (number of days) was checked monthly during t
he 1-year follow-up period and compliance was also assessed. Results.
From 40 general practices 363 patients who were gainfully employed wer
e included. In the exercise therapy group the percentage of patients w
ith sickness absence was higher and the duration of absence was longer
than in the placebo and usual care groups, but these differences were
not significant. Indications of mole absence in the exercise therapy
group appeared to be based largely on a greater number of patients wit
h absences during the first 3 months. Patients in the exercise group w
ho had not reported sick at entry had more sickness absences during th
e follow-up year than patients in the usual care and placebo group. Go
od compliance did not affect the results. Conclusions. Exercise therap
y for patients with acute low back pain does not reduce sickness absen
ce.