Jg. Mcgivern et al., ACTIONS OF THE NOVEL NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENT, LIFARIZINE (RS-X7476), ONVOLTAGE-DEPENDENT SODIUM CURRENTS IN THE NEUROBLASTOMA CELL-LINE, N1E-115, British Journal of Pharmacology, 114(8), 1995, pp. 1738-1744
1 The actions of the neuroprotective agent, lifarizine (RS-87476-190),
on voltage-dependent Na+ currents have been examined in the neuroblas
toma cell line, N1E-115, using the whole-cell variant of the patch cla
mp technique. 2 At a holding potential of -80 mV, lifarizine reduced t
he peak Na+ current evoked by a 10 ms depolarizing step with an IC50 o
f 1.3 mu M. At holding potentials of -100 and -60 mV the IC50 concentr
ations of lifarizine were 7.3 mu M and 0.3 mu M, respectively. 3 At a
holding potential of -100 mV, most channels were in the resting state
and the IC50 value for inhibition of Na+ current should correspond to
the dissociation constant of lifarizine for resting channels (K-R). K-
R was therefore estimated to be 7.3 mu M. 4 In the absence of lifarizi
ne, recovery from inactivation following a 20 s depolarization from -1
00 mV to 0 mV was complete within 2 s. However in the presence of 3 mu
M lifarizine recovery took place in a biexponential fashion with time
constants of 7 s and 79 s. 5 Lifarizine (1 mu M) had no effect on ste
ady-state inactivation curves when conditioning pre-pulses of 1 s dura
tion were used. However, when pre-pulse durations of 1 min were used t
he curves were shifted to the left by lifarizine by about 10 mV. Analy
sis of the shifts induced by a range of lifarizine concentrations reve
aled that the apparent affinity of lifarizine for the inactivated stat
e of the channel (K-1) was 0.19 mu M. 6 Lifarizine (1 mu M) had no eff
ect on chloramine-T-modified Na+ currents, suggesting no significant o
pen channel interaction. 7 Taken together, these data show that lifari
zine is a potent voltage-dependent inhibitor of Na+ currents in N1E-11
5 cells and that the voltage-dependence arises from an interaction of
the compound with the inactivated state of the channel. The possible c
ontribution of Na+ current inhibition to the neuroprotective actions o
f lifarizine is discussed.