T. Tanaka et al., DUAL FUNCTIONS OF THE AML1 EVI-1 CHIMERIC PROTEIN IN THE MECHANISM OFLEUKEMOGENESIS IN T(3-21) LEUKEMIAS/, Molecular and cellular biology, 15(5), 1995, pp. 2383-2392
The chromosomal translocation t(3;21)(q26;q22), which is found in blas
tic crisis in chronic myelogenous leukemias and myelodysplastic syndro
me-derived leukemias, produces AML1/Evi-1 chimeric transcription facto
r and is thought to play important roles in acute leukemic transformat
ion of hemopoietic stem cells. We report here the functional analyses
of AML1/EVi-1. It was revealed that AML1/Evi-1 itself does not alter t
he transactivation level through mouse polyomavirus enhancer-binding p
rotein 2 (PEBP2; PEA2) sites (binding site of AML1) but dominantly sup
presses the transactivation by intact AML1, which is assumed to be a s
timulator of myeloid cell differentiation. DNA-binding competition is
a putative mechanism of such dominant negative effects of AML1/Evi-1 b
ecause it binds to PEBP2 sites with higher affinity than AML1 does. Fu
rthermore, AML1/Evi-1 stimulated c-fos promoter transactivation and in
creased AP-1 activity, as Evi-1 (which is not normally expressed in he
mopoietic cells) did. Experiments using deletion mutants of AML1/Evi-1
showed that these two functions are mutually independent because the
dominant negative effects on intact AML1 and the stimulation of AP-1 a
ctivity are dependent on the runt domain (DNA-binding domain of AML1)
and the zinc finger domain near the C terminus, respectively. Furtherm
ore, we showed that AML1/Evi-1 blocks granulocytic differentiation, ot
herwise induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, of 32Dcl3 my
eloid cells. It was also suggested that both AML1-derived and Evi-1-de
rived portions of the fusion protein play crucial roles in this differ
entiation block We conclude that the leukemic cell transformation in t
(3;21) leukemias is probably caused by these dual functions of AML1/Ev
i-1 chimeric protein.