EFFERENT-MEDIATED PROTECTION FROM ACOUSTIC OVEREXPOSURE - RELATION TOSLOW EFFECTS OF OLIVOCOCHLEAR STIMULATION

Citation
Er. Reiter et Mc. Liberman, EFFERENT-MEDIATED PROTECTION FROM ACOUSTIC OVEREXPOSURE - RELATION TOSLOW EFFECTS OF OLIVOCOCHLEAR STIMULATION, Journal of neurophysiology, 73(2), 1995, pp. 506-514
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,Physiology,Neurosciences,Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223077
Volume
73
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
506 - 514
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3077(1995)73:2<506:EPFAO->2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
1. The present study attempts to resolve discrepancies in the reported role of olivocochlear (OC) efferent activation in protecting the inne r ear from acoustic overstimulation: in previous studies, activating t he OC system in guinea pigs reduced the threshold shift caused by 1 mi n monaural exposure to a 10-kHz tone: whereas unilateral OC activation in cats had no effect on threshold shifts following binaural exposure to a 10 min 6-kHz tone. 2. In this study, anesthetized and curarized guinea pigs were exposed either monaurally or binaurally to tones of d ifferent duration (1-5 min), frequency (6 to 10 kHz) and intensity (10 5-118 dB SPL). For each exposure condition, threshold shifts were comp ared among ears with different levers of OC activation: in some cases, the OC bundle (OCB) was electrically stimulated during (and/or before ) the acoustic overexposure: in others, the OCB was cut before the exp osure; in control cases. the OCB was neither cut nor electrically stim ulated. 3. Electrical stimulation of the OCB delivered simultaneously with acoustic overstimulation produced significant reductions in thres hold shift only for acoustic exposures at higher frequencies (8 and 10 kHz) and shorter durations( 1 and 2 min). The protective effects on 1 -min exposures could be extinguished by prior stimulation of the OCB, i.e., if the OC stimulation was turned on 1 min before the acoustic ov erexposure. 4. These observations provide circumstantial evidence that protection is related to the newly discovered ''slow'' effects of OC activation rather than the classic ''fast'' effects because, in contra st to fast effects, slow effects 1) are maximal in frequency regions a ffected by 10-kHz exposures and are minimal in regions affected by 6-k Hz exposures and 2) can only be maintained for 1-2 min in the face of continuous OC stimulation.