Jf. Aupetit et al., PROFIBRILLATORY EFFECTS OF LIDOCAINE IN THE ACUTELY ISCHEMIC PORCINE HEART, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 25(5), 1995, pp. 810-816
Because recent clinical studies have failed to show evidence of the be
nefit of lidocaine in the arrhythmias occurring in the early stage of
myocardial infarction and have even shown an increased mortality in pa
tients thus treated, we investigated the value of lidocaine as a prote
ctive agent against ventricular fibrillation related to myocardial isc
hemia in the in situ heart of anesthetized open-chest pigs subjected t
o transient total occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending c
oronary artery (LAD) under ventricular pacing at a constant high rate.
Vulnerability to the fibrillatory process induced by coronary occlusi
on was assessed both by time to onset of ventricular fibrillation (TF)
and by electrical ventricular fibrillation threshold (EFT) determined
after coronary occlusions of increasing duration (30, 60, 120, 180 s)
. Monophasic action potential (MAP) was recorded concurrently in the n
onischemic and ischemic areas. Lidocaine, even in relatively high dose
s (2-4 mg . kg(-1)), did not prolong TF, nor did it increase EFT. On t
he contrary, TF was significantly shortened and EFT was significantly
decreased (15-30%) at the maximal concentrations of lidocaine, with re
turn to control values in 40-60 min. Therefore, lidocaine tends to inc
rease the risk of ischemic ventricular fibrillation (VF): It fails to
control the extreme enhancement of excitability and worsens conduction
disorders, even though it decreases normal conduction only slightly.
Use of lidocaine against rhythm disorders in acute myocardial infarcti
on (AMI), is at least debatable and probably contraindicated.