MEASURING LEAF-AREA INDEX IN A SPARSE EUCALYPT FOREST - A COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES FROM DIRECT MEASUREMENT, HEMISPHERICAL PHOTOGRAPHY, SUNLIGHT TRANSMITTANCE AND ALLOMETRIC REGRESSION
Kr. Whitford et al., MEASURING LEAF-AREA INDEX IN A SPARSE EUCALYPT FOREST - A COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES FROM DIRECT MEASUREMENT, HEMISPHERICAL PHOTOGRAPHY, SUNLIGHT TRANSMITTANCE AND ALLOMETRIC REGRESSION, Agricultural and forest meteorology, 74(3-4), 1995, pp. 237-249
In the dry sclerophyll jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Sm.) fores
ts of the south-west of Western Australia, measurements of leaf area i
ndex (L) are required to study tree growth, water use and mine rehabil
itation on typically sparse stands (L = 1-2). This study compared thre
e indirect estimators of L-sunlight transmittance collected with the D
EMON measurement system, hemispherical photography and allometric rela
tionships-with the results of a direct measurement (L = 1.05). The est
imate of leaf area from the allometric relationship was not significan
tly different from the direct estimate (P > 0.20), overestimating L by
9%. The DEMON system and the hemispherical photography overestimated
L by 58% and 73%, respectively. These overestimates reduced to 20% and
32%, respectively, when the projected area of stems and branches was
also considered in the comparison. When logarithmic averaging of the l
ight transmittance was used, the DEMON overestimated L by 132% and ove
restimated the projected area of stems, branches and leaves by 77%. Wh
ere seasonal or other small differences in L are studied, techniques b
ased on light transmission may not detect differences in L that are sm
aller than one. The results from this single plot are inconclusive, an
d further studies of the performance of hemispherical photography and
sunlight transmittance should be made under sparse canopies.