Gc. Duff et al., EFFECTS OF ADAPTATION TO LASALOCID, MONENSIN OR A DAILY ROTATION OF LASALOCID AND MONENSIN ON IN-VITRO FERMENTATION OF A 90-PERCENT CONCENTRATE DIET, Canadian journal of animal science, 75(1), 1995, pp. 129-134
Effects of adaptation to L, M or a daily rotation of L and M (R) on in
vitro fermentation were measured in a replicated in vitro experiment
with a 4 x 4 factorial arrangement of treatments. Treatments were adap
tation of ruminal fluid donor steers (0 or ZOO mg steer(-1) d(-1) of L
, M or R) and culture ionophore treatment (0 or 4 mu g mL(-1) of L, M
or a 50:50 mixture of L and M). At 12 and 24 h, IVDMD was increased (P
< 0.05) by adaptation to L compared with M, and decreased at 12 h (P
< 0.05) by adaptation to R compared with the average of L and M adapta
tion. At 6 and 12 h, culture ionophore treatments increased (P < 0.10)
IVDMD, compared with control. After 24 and 48 h of in vitro incubatio
n, L adaptation increased (P < 0.01) acetate, decreased (P < 0.01) pro
pionate, increased the acetate/propionate ratio (P < 0.01), and increa
sed total VFA (P < 0.05), compared with M adaptation. Total VFA was in
creased (P < 0.10) for ionophore adaptation treatments compared with c
ontrol at 48 h of incubation. Culture ionophore treatments decreased (
P < 0.10) acetate and increased (P < 0.05) propionate at 24 and 48 h a
nd decreased the acetate/propionate ratio (P < 0.10) at 24 h of incuba
tion versus control cultures, with no measurable effects on total VFA.
Adaptation treatments did not interact with culture treatments, sugge
sting that animals used as inoculum donors for in vitro experiments in
volving ionophores need not be adapted to an ionophore.