THE TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SWELLING OF SHALES UNDER CYCLIC WETTING ANDDRYING

Citation
Sl. Huang et al., THE TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SWELLING OF SHALES UNDER CYCLIC WETTING ANDDRYING, International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics abstracts, 32(3), 1995, pp. 227-236
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Geosciences, Interdisciplinary","Mining & Mineral Processing
ISSN journal
01489062
Volume
32
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
227 - 236
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Swelling rock such as shale can generate uplift force below foundation s often resulting in structure deformation. The expansive upward force can be reduced, however, if the rock undergoes cycles of hydration an d dehydration. An effort was attempted to measure the changes of swell ing potentials (i.e. pressure and strain) of shales while the samples underwent two cycles of wetting-and-drying treatments at different tem peratures between -10 and 23 degrees C. Two sets of twenty-five shale samples collected from one coal mine in interior Alaska and two mines in southwestern Pennsylvania were tested under confined and free swell ing conditions. The maximum swelling pressure and strain developed wit hin the shales were related to three factors: shale moisture susceptib ility, resting temperature, and initial tempering air humidity. As a r esult of the first cycle swelling tests, 76% of the samples failed (i. e. cracked) in the confined test and 56% of samples similarly failed i n the free swelling tests. Samples that did not fail were brought back to their initial state of water saturation. The second cycle swelling tests were next performed on those samples. This attempt allowed meas urements of a reduction of swelling pressure and strain of the shale s amples. Swelling pressure and strain of the samples decreased consider ably in the second cycle of tests. The reduction in swelling potential was likely caused by the growth of microcracks in the samples during the first cycle of swelling test. The swelling pressure and strain mea sured in the second cycle test were noted to have strong correlation w ith the swelling potentials measured in the first cycle.